Assimilation - Part 7 Making More and Better Disciples of Jesus Christ

The motto, tag-line, goal or the calling for Faith Community Church of Hudson, WI is to Make More and Better Disciples of Jesus Christ. Yesterday, I briefly outlined four strategies that may be used in assimilation. The ultimate goal being to present Jesus Christ. The four strategies are also key and integral to "making more and better disciples." I believe that the four strategies of Corporate Worship, Open Groups, Closed Groups and Ministry Teams are further defined in the context of making, maturing and multiplying disciples.

Making disciples is were we begin. It is the first step. The open group is a foundational strategy that serves as an entry point for yet-to-be Christians. An open group is primarily an evangelistic Bible study group or event comprised of an intentional mix of both believers and unbelievers. The focus is evangelism.

An evangelistic Bible study group is a group intentionally formed around the study of God's Word. This is deferent from a group that gathers for support, fellowship, leadership training or skill development. Groups that are designed primarily for reaching lost people are open groups.

An evangelistic Bible study is not restricted to studying the first four chapters of John (can you tell I have Navigator training?) although it may. How I view an evangelistic Bible study is regardless of the group topic whether it be nutrition, weight loss, divorce recovery, stress management, parenting, or other life issues they are discussed in the context of the Bible and the supremacy of Christ. The intention is to share Christ.

It might be helpful to think of open groups being of two kinds. I don't have specific names for these two kinds. So, I will use examples. The first would be along our current Alpha program. Alpha is specific to challenge people about who God is and to investigate and have their questions answered about Jesus. The second type would address life issues common to individuals, families and community.

The hope is that open groups engage people in the biblical model of instruction that begins to lead people toward spiritual tranformation. This is the first step, but is only the starting line. People must be encouraged to continue their journey in a closed group experience.

Assimilation - Part 6 Strategies

I am going to briefly cover four strategies to use in assimilation. These strategies where developed in the book "Kingdom Principles for Church Growth." In subsequent posts I will discuss at least three of them in greater depth.

The first is corporate Worship. Corporate worship exists for believers to celebrate God's grace and mercy, to proclaim God's truth and to evangelize the lost in a atmosphere of encountering the presence, holiness and revelation of Almighty God.

The second strategy is Open Groups. Open groups lead people to faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. These groups are avenues of reaching into the community to minister to the communities need. This strategy is built around building relationships and encouraging yet-to-be Christians. These groups combine believers with yet-to-be believers in an atmosphere of compassion with the intention to share the gospel. These groups are open to anyone.

The next strategy is Closed Groups. Closed groups build kingdom leaders and equip believers to serve by engaging people in discipleship that moves them toward spiritual transformation through short-term, self-contained training units in an atmosphere of accountability to God and to each other. A closed group is primarily an equipping group for believers. The focus is on training in the context of discipleship.

An lastly, a Ministry Team strategy. Ministry teams exist to build up the body of Christ to accomplish the work of service within the church and to be involved in missions outside the church through new or existing kingdom units in an atmosphere of prayer and urgency for people in need of God's love.

Assimilation - Part 5 When does Assimilation Begin?

Most of us (which included me) think assimilation begins once a person visits our church. We think of assimilation as newcomer follow-up. I am coming to understand that this is a limited definition of assimilation. In actuality assimilation starts before a person attends church for the first time. Assimilation needs to be intricately linked to evangelism.

If churches are to do effective assimilation it is imperative that there be ministry activity happening in the community. Examples of this would be if someone moves into your neighborhood. You reach out a helping hand to complete the move. Or it may be a community need like handyman work that is done by a group of servants that view this as a ministry to the community. Rather than concentrating too much on follow-up, we need to initiate contact. By initiating we intentionally develop ministries in the community that begin the process of connecting people to the church and to Christ.

The longer one is a Christian the fewer yet-to-be Christian friends on tends to have. This is sad but generally very true. Christians like to hang out with Christians. When this happens the necessary relationships with yet-to-be Christians that need to be in place in order to do effective assimilation is not nurtured. We must intentionally develop ministries that are focused out into the community to build relationship with yet-to-be Christians.

In intentionally developing ministries, we are being programmatic and organizational. What we desire to happen is that individuals begin to develop a mentality to cultivate relationships with yet-to-be Christians. This will move the process from being a program to being personal and a natural process for us. It becomes a learned way of living.

When assimilation is organic, people will naturally share Christ at a personal level. They will not have to wait on the church to mobilize them to practice evangelism or be told to make sure they invite their friends to the latest "seeker sensitive" worship service.

This should be our goal is to develop a consciousness within Christians to minister naturally instead of programmatically.

What ministries do we at FCC have that are based in the community? What are some possible ministries that could be developed?

Assimilation - Part 4 continued.

I read an article yesterday after writing my post that goes right along with the "us vs them" mentality that I spoke to. You can view the article here. Below are the first two and the last paragraph of the article from Outreach Magazine.

In April 2003, National Public Radio aired a news story about a standoff between an angry mob of Iraqi Shiites and a heavily armored patrol from the American 101st Airborne Division. Fearing that the soldiers were about to desecrate their holy shrine, hundreds of unarmed civilians pressed in toward the soldiers, waving their hands and shouting defiantly. Although the patrol's intentions were peaceful, the standoff would most likely have ended in tragedy—had it not been for the quick thinking of U.S. Lt. Col. Christopher Hughes.

The commanding officer that day, Hughes picked up a loudspeaker and barked three simple commands to his group. First, he told them to take a knee; second, to point their weapons toward the ground; and finally, to look up and give everyone in the hostile crowd a friendly smile. Within moments of obeying his orders, NPR reported, the troops saw the crowd's demeanor transform. Hostility and defiance melted away, as smiles and friendly pats on the back replaced shaking fists and screaming voices.

Lt. Col. Hughes saved the day as he acted in wisdom toward the Iraqis. I pray that the Church will follow his example. Let's take a knee (a position of humility, whereby we come as listeners and wonderers—not know-it-alls). Let's point our guns to the ground (backing away from the confrontational attempts to overpower people with our dogmatic certainty). And let's look up and smile (communicate that we're warm, friendly people who come to build bridges of care).

Assimilation - Part 4 "Us vs Them"

In this world (at least my world), we tend to view peoples as either Christian or non-Christian. By doing this are we setting up a "class system?" Ever heard someone say "I can't do that with Joe he is not a Christian." Not only have I heard that I have said it. We Christians have our things that we can only do with other Christians.

Or, if we are going to allow (invite) the non-Christian to attend then we got to make it "seeker sensitive." We change our language that is no Christian jargon. We sugar-coat our questions to them.

A tangible example of this is T-shirts that are worn by Christians as a "witness." We are saying I got it and you don't.

You may have noticed in some of my last posts that I have begun to use "yet-to-be Christian" when referring to non-Christians. Now you might be thinking "Bill, you are just playing with words." And yes I am. But, I think this play on words can help us not view people as either Christian or in another class. We need to intentionally develop a view of people that includes them totally (regardless of any characteristic or trait) as people who need grace and mercy just as we once and still do.

We also need a mindset of going to there "place." We tend to try to attract the yet-to-be Christian to our safe place (church building). Think about this hypothetical possibility. Across the street from your church building every Sunday morning a group of people (age 0 to 99) gather to race remote control cars. It is a remote control car club. Some people from our church begin to recognize that they are there every Sunday morning. The wheels get to turning and ah ha the car club becomes a target group for the church. Plans begin to form. We will reach out to them with a special event geared toward them. (Note: even as I am typing this post, I am using puns that would relate to the car club.) We might do something like this. We identify Jim Blow a Christian who attends our church and owns a hobby shop as a person who would be able to relate to the club. Jim Blow will be our speaker. Let's create a nice brochure that we can put under there windshield wipers on Sunday while they are doing their club thing. On and on we plan. Should work right! Can you identify with doing something like this?

What we need to do is go to there place. What about this approach? It starts the same as we notice the yet-to-be Christians and then decide to target the car club. Rather this time the church commissions a few of it members to join the car club. The church buys the remote control cars for these commissioned people from Jim Blow's hobby shop. They begin to befriend the car club members every Sunday morning. Slowly getting to know them and slowly earning their trust with the intention of sharing Christ with them. Actually all along sharing Christ with them with the intention of one day having them make a decision about Christ.

Referring to a previous post where I identified 5 people groups that we want to assimilate. Can you think of ideas for each of these groups of how we might go to their place?

Does anyone have a suggestion for another word we might use instead of assimilation? My current working definition of assimilation is the process of intentionally bringing, including, integrating people into the life of the local church with the goal of equipping and releasing them to serve and advance the kingdom of God. What would you suggest as a few words to define this process of assimilation? Think of it in these terms rather that Assimilation Ministry, What would you call it?

Christ is All!

I more and more understanding that Christ is all. In addition to reading a book which is titled "Christ is All" by David Bryant, I came across this paragraph in reading "The Shape of Things To Come" by Michael Frost & Alan Hirsch.

Chistianity is not a doctrine but a person to whom I entrust myself without reserve. If Christianity were merely a codtrine, its leader would be just as superfluous as the teachers of any other sort of religious or philosophical sytem. The focus would be on the truth claims, which are learned and then appropriated independently of the instructor. Since, however, Christianity is not simpley a set of beliefs but is inseperably connected to the person of the Messiah, it stands or falls with him. Christianity's principles, moreover, can never be understood independently of the person of Christ. Consequently, to understand Christ's words "by themselves" - that is, as doctrine - is to discount the element from which they receive their basic meaning, the divinity of their speaker. For the true believer, it is blasphemy to say that Christ's words are merely wise or profound, for that puts them on par with human philosophies and takes away the transcendence of him who proclaimed them. Our histories was well as our destinies are caught up inextricably with the person of Jesus the Messiah. We are embroiled in messianic destiny.

I increasingly find statements like this liberating. This is true freedom. I pursue Christ not a list of doctrine. I desire doctrine as a result of Jesus Christ the Messiah. Only by and through him is doctrine defined. Christ is truly all!

Assimilation - Part 3

Today I will seek to give definition to the different people groups that we should be trying to assimilate into the church (body of believers). Please note that the people groups I am about to define in general is not characterized by Christ followers or yet-to be Christ followers. As I believe all groups may and probably do contain both.

I have come up with 5 people groups that either will visit a church or the church would like to reach out to and bring to the church.

1. Visiting as a result of being in the area.
   These people truly are visitor. They may sporadically repeat their visit to the church, but are not looking to be “assimilated.”
   a. They are visiting relatives or friends
   b. They are on a vacation or a business trip
2. Visiting as in searching for a new church home.
   a. They are new to the area.
   b. Their current church is not meeting their needs.
3. Visiting to investigate Christ.
   a. They are invited by a current attendee of the church.
   b. They have a crisis in life.
   c. They have no crisis but feel something missing in their life. What is my purpose?
4. Attendees of the Church.
   a. They are attending worship services, but not involved or feel connected.
   b. They do not see themselves as a vital part of the body of Christ.
5. Those that do not attend a Church.
   a. They may be opposed to the church for various reasons.
   b. They may have never been exposed to the church.

Assimilation - Part 2

Today I am going to give several definitions of "assimilation" as related to the church specifically. These definitions come from some of the materials I have read recently.

Assimilation is the task of moving people from an awareness of your church to attendance at your church to active membership in your church. - Rick Warren, The Purpose Driven Church

Assimilation is the process by which we welcome, receive, and incorporate individuals (families) into our community of believers.

Assimilation has three components: absorption, integration, and incorporation. Assimilation as absorption is to bring into the tradition of a group. Assimilation as integration is to coordinate or blend into a unified whole. Assimilation as incorporation is to unite into one body. - Robert Bast, Attracting New Members

Assimilation is the process of intentionally bringing, including, integrating people into the life of the local church with the goal of equipping and releasing them to serve both the local church and the kingdom of God. - Owen Facey, A Guide To Assimilation In The Local Church

Ron Jenson and Jim Stevens refer to assimilation as absorption. They define absorption as the process by which people are taken into the life of the church and by which a strong sense of identity and belonging develops. - Dynamics of Church Growth

There are many definitions and each is different. Yet they are all true. Each contains aspects that we would all agree are assimilation. Some of us probably look at these definition and resonate with them at many levels as I do.

The one I resonate with most is Owen Facey's. I particularly like the idea of "intentionally bringing." The other definitions seem to imply that the people come on their own or are attracted to the church. We as a church can believe if only we can find the right program, topic, buzz word or speaker etc. That not-yet-Christians will come to us. When I read Facey's definition I get the sense of going to the not-yet-Christian and "bringing" them. Look for more on this in a later post on assimilation.

Which definition do you resonate with, or do you have another definition?

Next post, I will try to identify the people groups we are assimilating.

Assimilation

As a result of the Fire & Reign Bible study (a sermon series and personal/group Bible Study by Jerry Sheveland), I came out of it with two action items (i.e. applications) for my life. I am going to post a series of thoughts about one of the applications. The application is seeking to do a better job of assimilation at FCC. Today I want to start by looking at the definition (dictionary.com).

Assimilation

1. The act or process of assimilating.
   The state of being assimilated.
2. Physiology. The conversion of nutriments into living tissue; constructive metabolism.
3. Linguistics. The process by which a sound is modified so that it becomes similar or identical to an adjacent or nearby sound. For example, the prefix in- becomes im- in impossible by assimilation to the labial p of possible.
4. The process whereby a minority group gradually adopts the customs and attitudes of the prevailing culture.

Don't you just love it when they use a form of the word to define the word. So, lets try assimilate.

1. Physiology.
   To consume and incorporate (nutrients) into the body after digestion.
   To transform (food) into living tissue by the process of anabolism; metabolize constructively.
2. To incorporate and absorb into the mind: assimilate knowledge.
3. To make similar; cause to resemble.
4. Linguistics. To alter (a sound) by assimilation.
5. To absorb (immigrants or a culturally distinct group) into the prevailing culture.

Out of those five definitions for assimilate, I believe two are applicable to some degree of what assimilation is or should be about in a body of believers (church). The two are numbers 3 and 5.

To assimilate an individual into the church based on these definition must relate to making similar or cause to resemble and to absorb into the prevailing culture. However, I am not sure that "prevailing" is the correct word. As prevailing gives the sense of most frequent or predominant.

Next post, I will look at a more refined definition specifically related to the church.

If you want to know my second application, ask me about it.

Am I "Forcefully" laying hold of the Kingdom?

From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it. (Matthew 11:12)

I read this verse this past weekend and was challenged by it. I looked up the word forcefully in the dictionary. The definition I found is: characterized by or full of force; effective. Other translations use the words suffered violence or has been coming violently (ESV and KJ).

God's kingdom is advancing from the days of John the Baptist through Jesus Christ and then by the Holy Spirit through men like the apostles and then many other men through out history. And has continued to advance to this present day. The kingdom will continue to advance and will one day be fully established by the return of Jesus Christ. I pray for that day to come quickly. And as I wait for that day, I must allow the Holy Spirit to work through me to effectively advance the kingdom day by day. These advancements which we are mercifully allowed to participate in are a foretaste of that final day.

I desire to be a forceful man who will be used by God to advance His kingdom.

FAITHCOM Blog Coalition link from FCC Website?

The staff is seeking input on whether we should provide links to any regular attenders blog. Currently, we have Pastor Porters Convergence blog and Men of Faith blog. Read the post and give your comments here.

Who do you identify with?

This is a typical question in Bible studies when looking at events discribed in the Bible. I am reading C. J. Mahaney's book "Living The Cross Centered Life". Mahaney posses the question "Who do you identify with?" in context of Jesus dying on the cross. Mahaney suggest that you may identify with Peter weeping over his denial of the Lord; Simon who was forced to carry Jesus' cross; Women standing at a distance watching; Mary His mother; John who Jesus spoke to from the cross; the thief on the cross or the centurion who after watching the events said, "truly this man was the Son of God!" (Mark 15:39).

Mahaney says: "I identify most with the angry mob screaming, "Crucify Him!"

He goes on to say: "That's who we should all identify with. Because apart from God's grace, this is where we would all be standing, and we're only flattering ourselves to think otherwise. Unless you see yourself standing there with the shrieking crowd, full of hostility and hatred for the holy and innocent Lamb of God, you don't really understand the nature and depth of your sin or the necessity of the cross."

That is so prefound! I can reasonate with this and slowly I am beginning to have this view. As I make Jesus Christ supreme in my life.